· Filmyzilla · Movies · 7 min read
Student of the Year 2 Movie Filmyzilla
A student must overcome bullies and hardships, both academic and romantic, in order to win his college's coveted Student of the Year trophy.

In a world of intense competition and youthful ambition, a determined student embarks on a challenging journey in “Student of the Year”. Battling against both intimidating adversaries and personal struggles, this individual strives to succeed academically and find love. All the while, the ultimate goal remains within reach: to claim the prestigious Student of the Year trophy.
Student of the Year 2 Details
Detail | Value |
---|---|
Movie Name | Student of the Year 2 |
Original Language | Hindi |
Spoken Languages | Hindi |
Release Date | 2019-05-10 |
Run Time | 2h 26m |
Country | India |
Genre | Romance, Comedy, Drama |
Writer | Punit Malhotra, Arshad Syed |
Director | Punit Malhotra |
Producer | Karan Johar, Apoorva Mehta, Yash Johar |
Screenplay | Aditya Pawar |
Production Company | Dharma Productions, Fox Star Studios |
Student of the Year 2 Movie Cast & Crew
Actor Name | Character Name |
---|---|
Tiger Shroff | Rohan Sachdev |
Ananya Panday | Shreya Randhawa |
Tara Sutaria | Mridula “Mia” Chawla |
Aditya Seal | Manav Singh Randhawa |
Samir Soni | Principal Gujral |
Gul Panag | Coach Kuljeet |
Abhishek Bajaj | Abhishek Sharma |
Manoj Pahwa | Coach Mahipal |
Ayesha Raza Mishra | Principal Singh |
Manasi Joshi Roy | Chachi |
Student of the Year 2 Movie Screenshots
A Glossy Facade: Peeling Back the Layers of Student of the Year 2
Released in 2019, Student of the Year 2, directed by someone known for their work in the romantic comedy genre, arrived with a hefty dose of anticipation. A sequel to the Karan Johar-helmed Student of the Year, the film stars a new generation of actors attempting to recapture the magic of the original. Featuring a trio of fresh faces in the lead alongside more seasoned performers, this installment aimed to be a youthful, vibrant, and high-energy romance-drama. However, upon release, it faced a barrage of criticism, both for its narrative choices and its perceived lack of substance. While the film performed moderately at the box office, its critical reception was largely negative. Going into the viewing experience, I hoped for a fun, lighthearted, and visually appealing movie, but tempered my expectations based on the mixed reviews. What I found was a film that, while aesthetically pleasing, struggled to deliver a compelling and meaningful story.
The film revolves around a young man with dreams of winning a prestigious inter-school competition and ultimately, achieving a dance scholarship. He transfers to a renowned school to be closer to his childhood sweetheart and pursue his dance aspirations. However, his life takes unexpected turns as he navigates the cutthroat world of academics, sports, and romantic rivalries. He finds himself caught in a love triangle with two strikingly different female characters, each vying for his attention while also pursuing their own individual goals. The narrative attempts to explore themes of ambition, loyalty, and the complexities of young love, set against the backdrop of a glamorous and competitive school environment. The journey is filled with dance-offs, sporting challenges, and melodramatic confrontations, all culminating in a climactic showdown where relationships are tested and dreams are either realized or shattered.
The story, while attempting to be a feel-good tale of youthful ambition, ultimately falls flat due to its predictable plot points and shallow character development. The pacing feels uneven, with certain segments dragging while others rush through crucial emotional moments. The narrative depth is noticeably lacking, failing to delve beneath the surface of the characters’ motivations and struggles. Any attempt at exploring themes of class difference or the pressure to succeed feels superficial and underdeveloped. Instead, the screenplay prioritizes showcasing lavish sets, extravagant costumes, and high-energy dance sequences, often at the expense of meaningful storytelling. While the film tries to incorporate elements of rivalry and competition, these aspects feel contrived and lack the genuine tension needed to truly engage the audience. What could have been a compelling story about self-discovery and the pursuit of dreams is ultimately reduced to a series of predictable tropes and superficial conflicts.
The characters, though visually appealing, lack the depth and nuance required to make them truly relatable or memorable. The male protagonist, initially portrayed as an earnest and ambitious young man, often comes across as indecisive and easily swayed by external influences. His romantic entanglements feel forced and lack genuine chemistry, making it difficult to invest in his relationships with either of the female leads. One of the female characters is portrayed as a strong, independent, and ambitious young woman who aspires to break free from societal expectations. However, her character arc feels somewhat predictable, and her motivations often appear to be driven more by jealousy and rivalry than by genuine self-belief. The other female character is depicted as a talented and charming individual, but her characterization is often overshadowed by the central love triangle, preventing her from fully developing as an independent and compelling personality. The supporting cast, while adding some comic relief and providing some level of mentorship, is largely relegated to the background and their contributions to the overall narrative are minimal. The performances are generally adequate, but none of the actors truly shine due to the limitations of the script. While the lead actors possess undeniable screen presence and deliver their lines with enthusiasm, their performances lack the emotional depth needed to elevate the characters beyond stereotypical representations. There isn’t really any standout performance that manages to rise above the general mediocrity of the character development.
The direction attempts to create a visually stunning and high-energy film, and in some respects, it succeeds. The cinematography is glossy and vibrant, showcasing the lavish sets, extravagant costumes, and meticulously choreographed dance sequences. The visual aesthetics are clearly a priority, with every frame carefully composed to create a sense of glamour and spectacle. The film employs various filming techniques, such as slow-motion shots and dynamic camera movements, to enhance the visual impact of the dance performances and action sequences. However, the focus on visual appeal often comes at the expense of narrative coherence and emotional depth. The use of sound and background score is generally effective in creating a lively and upbeat atmosphere, but at times, the music overwhelms the dialogue and distracts from the emotional nuances of the scenes. The overall atmosphere is consistently high-energy and youthful, but it often feels artificial and detached from the realities of the characters’ lives. While the director manages to create a visually appealing and entertaining film, they ultimately fail to deliver a story with substance and emotional resonance.
In conclusion, Student of the Year 2 is a visually appealing but ultimately hollow sequel that fails to recapture the magic of the original. While the film boasts a talented cast, impressive dance sequences, and a glossy aesthetic, it suffers from a predictable plot, shallow character development, and a lack of emotional depth. Compared to other films in the genre, it lacks the genuine charm and heartwarming moments that make those films memorable. While the director attempts to create a high-energy and entertaining film, they ultimately prioritize visual spectacle over meaningful storytelling.
Ultimately, Student of the Year 2 is a film that might appeal to viewers seeking a lighthearted and visually appealing distraction. However, those looking for a film with substance, emotional depth, and memorable characters are likely to be disappointed. It’s a cinematic confection that looks good on the surface but leaves a lingering aftertaste of dissatisfaction. Is it worth watching? Perhaps, if you’re in the mood for something purely superficial and don’t mind overlooking its flaws. But if you’re seeking a truly engaging and memorable cinematic experience, there are far better options available. I encourage you to share your own thoughts and opinions on the film. Did you find it as shallow and predictable as I did, or did you appreciate its visual appeal and lighthearted entertainment value? Let’s discuss!