· Filmyzilla · Movies · 6 min read
Sarkar Movie Filmyzilla
NRI corporate Sundar Ramasamy comes to India to vote, only to learn that his vote has already been cast. While he reclaims his right legally, it also ...

In this compelling political drama, an overseas Indian businessman returns to his homeland to exercise his right to vote, only to discover a fraudulent vote already cast in his name. His quest to reclaim his vote through legal channels unexpectedly catapults him into the complex world of Indian politics. Driven by a desire for systemic change, he embarks on a journey to challenge corruption and transform the political landscape from within.
Sarkar Details
Detail | Value |
---|---|
Movie Name | Sarkar |
Original Language | Tamil |
Spoken Languages | Tamil |
Release Date | 2018-11-06 |
Run Time | 2h 44m |
Country | India |
Genre | Action, Drama |
Writer | A.R. Murugadoss |
Director | A.R. Murugadoss |
Producer | Kalanithi Maran |
Screenplay | A.R. Murugadoss |
Production Company | Sun Pictures |
Sarkar Movie Cast & Crew
Actor Name | Character Name |
---|---|
Vijay | Sundar Ramasamy |
Keerthy Suresh | Nila |
Varalaxmi Sarathkumar | Komalavalli aka Pappa |
Prem | Sundar Ramasamy’s Brother |
Yogi Babu | Kaushik |
Radha Ravi | Malarvannan aka Rendu |
Tulasi | M. Masilamani’s Wife |
Rajesh | EC Committee Chairman |
Livingston | Venkatesan |
Yuvina Parthavi | Sundar Ramasamy’s Niece |
Sarkar Movie Screenshots
Sarkar: A Fiery Political Drama That Ignites Debate
“Sarkar,” released on November 6, 2018, thundered onto screens with the promise of a hard-hitting action drama. Directed by a filmmaker known for socially conscious narratives, and featuring a charismatic leading man at its helm, the film quickly became a talking point. Expectations were sky-high. This wasn’t just another commercial entertainer; it was a film that dared to question the very fabric of the political system. While the film garnered significant box office success and sparked heated debates, the experience of watching “Sarkar” is one that leaves you grappling with its ambitious scope and occasionally uneven execution.
The story centers around a powerful and successful NRI businessman who returns to his homeland to cast his vote in the state elections. Initially driven by a simple civic duty, his world is turned upside down when he discovers his vote has been fraudulently cast. This seemingly minor incident unravels a complex web of corruption, election rigging, and political maneuvering that plunges him headfirst into the murky world of Indian politics. What begins as a personal quest for justice quickly transforms into a crusade against systemic corruption, as he vows to cleanse the system and fight for the rights of the common man.
The strength of the narrative lies in its initial premise and its unflinching portrayal of political realities. The film effectively captures the frustration and disillusionment felt by many citizens towards a system perceived as inherently corrupt. The first half of the film unfolds at a brisk pace, establishing the protagonist’s character and the central conflict with engaging clarity. However, as the story progresses, it occasionally falls prey to oversimplification and predictable plot devices. The narrative, while compelling, sometimes sacrifices nuanced storytelling for the sake of dramatic impact. The film also grapples with balancing the protagonist’s lone-wolf approach with the need for a grounded and believable support system. This often leads to rushed character development and reliance on familiar tropes. Despite these shortcomings, the story manages to hold your attention, driven by its topical themes and the protagonist’s unwavering resolve. The script incorporates clever dialogues and impactful scenes that resonate with the audience’s concerns about governance and social justice, making the film thought-provoking, despite its commercial packaging. The symbolism is also notable, using visual cues and metaphors to represent the protagonist’s transformation from a detached businessman to a passionate advocate for change.
The film rests heavily on the shoulders of its leading man, who delivers a powerhouse performance as the righteous protagonist. He convincingly portrays the character’s transition from a detached, corporate figure to a fiery political leader. His screen presence is undeniable, commanding attention with his powerful dialogues and action sequences. The actress playing the female lead provides a commendable performance, even though her character is somewhat underwritten and relegated to a supporting role. She adds a layer of emotional depth to the narrative, although the film could have benefitted from a more fleshed-out romantic subplot. Perhaps the most memorable performance comes from the actress portraying the antagonist, a shrewd and ruthless politician. She embodies the dark side of power with chilling precision, making her a formidable adversary for the protagonist. Her portrayal is nuanced, showcasing not just the villainy, but also the calculated intelligence and unwavering ambition that drives her actions. Other supporting characters, including a comedic sidekick, provide moments of levity and support the main narrative, even if their roles are somewhat stereotypical. However, it is the clash between the protagonist and the antagonist, fueled by their contrasting ideologies and unwavering resolve, that truly elevates the film’s dramatic tension.
The director’s vision is evident in the film’s grand scale and its attempt to address complex political issues. While the film occasionally suffers from pacing issues and predictable plot points, the director’s skillful handling of action sequences and dramatic moments ensures that the film remains engaging. The cinematography is visually striking, utilizing vibrant colors and dynamic camera angles to enhance the film’s energy and amplify its impact. The film’s visual aesthetics are designed to create a sense of heightened realism and draw the audience into the protagonist’s world. The use of slow-motion and dramatic close-ups during key moments amplifies the tension and emotion, contributing to the overall cinematic experience. The editing is generally sharp and efficient, although some scenes could have benefitted from tighter pacing.
The sound design and background score play a crucial role in enhancing the film’s atmosphere and emotional impact. The music is powerful and emotive, effectively underscoring the protagonist’s struggles and triumphs. The use of traditional instruments and contemporary beats creates a unique sonic landscape that complements the film’s themes. The sound effects are crisp and realistic, adding to the intensity of the action sequences. The overall atmosphere is one of heightened tension and political intrigue, reflecting the film’s central themes of corruption and social justice. The use of silence and ambient sounds in certain scenes also adds to the film’s dramatic impact, creating moments of introspection and reflection.
“Sarkar” is a film that attempts to blend commercial entertainment with social commentary, resulting in a product that is both engaging and thought-provoking. Its strengths lie in its powerful performances, its visually striking cinematography, and its exploration of relevant political themes. However, the film also suffers from occasional pacing issues, predictable plot devices, and a tendency towards oversimplification. Compared to some of the director’s previous works, “Sarkar” arguably lacks the nuanced storytelling and character development that distinguished those films. However, it remains a compelling and entertaining watch, driven by its topical themes and its charismatic leading man.
Ultimately, “Sarkar” is a worthwhile cinematic experience, particularly for those interested in political dramas and action films with a social message. It sparks a dialogue about the need for change and challenges viewers to reflect on their own role in shaping a better society. While not a perfect film, it is a bold and ambitious attempt to address complex issues within the framework of commercial cinema. It is a film that will leave you pondering long after the credits roll, making it a compelling and relevant addition to the landscape of Indian cinema. Whether you agree with its political messaging or not, “Sarkar” undoubtedly leaves a lasting impression.
What are your thoughts on the movie “Sarkar”? Did you find its portrayal of the political system compelling? Share your opinions and start a conversation!