· Filmyzilla · Movies · 6 min read
100 Movie Filmyzilla
Honest police officer Vishnu seems to have the perfect professional and personal life. When a stranger named Harsha, who manipulates and cheats women ...

Get ready for a thrilling ride with this action-packed story centered around a seemingly flawless law enforcement officer. This individual’s life takes an unexpected turn with the arrival of a mysterious figure. This newcomer is a master of deception and uses the internet to manipulate and exploit unsuspecting women. As their paths collide, our protagonist is plunged into a chaotic and unpredictable series of events that will test his skills and challenge everything he thought he knew.
100 Details
Detail | Value |
---|---|
Movie Name | 100 |
Original Language | Kannada |
Spoken Languages | Kannada |
Release Date | 2021-11-19 |
Run Time | 2h 0m |
Country | India |
Genre | Crime, Thriller, Drama |
Writer | Ramesh Aravind |
Director | Ramesh Aravind |
Producer | Ramesh Reddy |
100 Movie Cast & Crew
Actor Name | Character Name |
---|---|
Ramesh Aravind | Inspector Vishnu |
Poorna | |
Rachita Ram | |
Vishwa Karna | |
Prakash Belawadi | |
Amitha Ranganath | |
Raju Talikote | |
Shobaraj |
100 Movie Screenshots
A Hundred Shades of Grey: A Review of “100”
The crime thriller “100,” released in late 2021, arrives with the weight of expectation usually reserved for seasoned veterans of the genre. Directed by a notable figure who also stars in the lead role, alongside a strong ensemble cast, the film promised a gripping narrative exploring the dark underbelly of modern crime and its impact on those who stand in its path. While not setting the box office ablaze, the movie generated considerable discussion, particularly around its timely themes and some noteworthy performances. Going in, the hope was for a taut, intelligent thriller that would leave a lasting impression, and while “100” delivers on some fronts, it ultimately presents a mixed bag of compelling ideas and slightly uneven execution.
The story centers around a dedicated police officer working in a bustling city. He is constantly battling the relentless tide of crime, often finding himself overwhelmed and stretched thin. The narrative kicks off with a sharp focus on the sheer volume of emergency calls the police receive, creating a sense of urgency and the overwhelming nature of law enforcement in the modern age. The officer’s life takes a sharp turn when he stumbles upon a series of cryptic messages and disturbing online activities that hint at a much larger and more sinister criminal network operating beneath the surface. As he delves deeper into the investigation, he uncovers a web of deceit, corruption, and violence that threatens to consume him and those he cares about. The plot thickens with each passing scene, throwing curveballs that test the officer’s resolve and pushing him to his limits. The core mystery revolves around identifying the puppet master behind these online machinations and preventing a potential catastrophe. The narrative is carefully constructed to build suspense, gradually revealing layers of complexity and forcing the protagonist to confront difficult choices.
The screenplay, however, occasionally stumbles. While the initial setup is undeniably compelling, the pacing sometimes feels uneven. There are moments of intense, gripping action, contrasted by stretches where the narrative lingers a bit too long on exposition or character development. The film strives to explore themes of morality, the pervasiveness of technology in crime, and the personal sacrifices demanded by a life dedicated to upholding justice. There’s a particularly potent thread about the emotional toll the job takes on law enforcement officers and the strain it puts on their families. Symbolism is subtly used, primarily through visual cues and recurring motifs related to the digital world, hinting at the ever-present surveillance and the loss of privacy in contemporary society. While the story aims for a multi-layered approach, some plot points felt slightly contrived, relying on convenient coincidences rather than organic development.
The film truly shines in its character portrayals. The protagonist, the aforementioned police officer, is brought to life with a nuanced performance, conveying both the weariness and the unwavering dedication of a man on the front lines. His internal struggles, the conflict between his professional duties and his personal life, are palpable and contribute significantly to the film’s emotional core. The actor manages to convey a sense of quiet strength and vulnerability, making the character both relatable and admirable. The female characters, while not always central to the plot, are well-developed and contribute significantly to the narrative. One female character, portraying a strong and independent woman caught in the web of crime, delivers a particularly impactful performance. Her portrayal captures a sense of resilience and determination in the face of overwhelming adversity. Another notable performance comes from an actor playing a character who provides crucial support to the protagonist, offering moments of levity and grounding amidst the darkness. The antagonist, though not always physically present, casts a long shadow over the proceedings, and his presence is felt through the insidious nature of his actions. Overall, the cast delivers strong, believable performances that elevate the material, making the characters feel real and relatable despite the often heightened circumstances.
The director’s vision for “100” is evident in the film’s visual style and overall atmosphere. The cinematography is often striking, utilizing a combination of gritty realism and stylized visuals to create a sense of unease and tension. The use of shadows and contrasting light is particularly effective in highlighting the moral ambiguity of the story and the darkness lurking beneath the surface. The film’s visual aesthetic often favors muted colors and a somber tone, reflecting the serious nature of the subject matter. Notable filming techniques, such as handheld camera work during action sequences and close-ups to capture emotional intensity, are employed effectively. The sound design also plays a crucial role in creating atmosphere, with a mix of ambient noise, pulsing electronic music, and a haunting background score that amplifies the suspense and emotional impact of key scenes. The director skillfully uses these cinematic elements to create a world that feels both familiar and unsettling, reflecting the insidious nature of modern crime and its impact on society. The pacing, as mentioned previously, sometimes falters, but the overall visual and auditory experience is undeniably compelling.
In conclusion, “100” is a film with several strengths. It boasts a compelling premise, strong performances from its ensemble cast, and a visually arresting aesthetic. It tackles relevant themes about the impact of technology on crime and the personal toll it takes on those who fight against it. However, the film is not without its flaws. The pacing can be uneven, and some plot points feel slightly contrived. While it doesn’t quite reach the heights of the best crime thrillers, it is a worthwhile watch for those interested in the genre. Compared to some previous work by the filmmaker, “100” shows a clear ambition to explore complex themes and push the boundaries of genre conventions. Whether it fully succeeds is debatable, but the effort is commendable.
Ultimately, “100” is a film that provokes thought and sparks conversation. It’s a solid entry into the crime thriller genre, despite its imperfections, and offers enough intrigue and emotional resonance to keep audiences engaged. I would recommend giving it a watch, especially if you are a fan of thrillers that delve into the darker aspects of human nature and the complexities of modern society. It’s a film that lingers in the mind, prompting reflection on the challenges faced by law enforcement and the ever-evolving landscape of crime in the digital age. What are your thoughts on the movie? Did it meet your expectations, and what aspects did you find most compelling or disappointing? I encourage you to share your opinions and join the discussion.